Call on the EC to ensure GMO compliance and market transparency ahead of EU–Mercosur agreement

Farm Europe and Eat Europe have addressed a letter to the European Commission raising concerns regarding the import of genetically modified (GM) cane sugar from Brazil and the implications for compliance with EU legislation, traceability standards, and market transparency after the recent provisional entry into force of the EU–Mercosur Agreement.

Brazil, the world’s largest producer and exporter of sugar, authorises and cultivates genetically modified sugar cane varieties alongside conventional ones. However, according to available information, no effective segregation between GM and non-GM sugar cane is carried out during processing, raising concerns that raw sugar exported to the European Union may derive from mixed production streams.

Over the past five years, EU Member States have imported approximately 3.6 million tonnes of sugar from Brazil, including more than 750,000 tonnes in the last year alone. These volumes are expected to rise further under the EU–Mercosur Agreement, which introduces a new annual duty-free quota of 180,000 tonnes of sugar.

Under EU legislation, food and feed consisting of, containing, or produced from genetically modified organisms must be authorised before being placed on the EU market. While certain genetically modified sugar beet varieties are authorised in the Union for import and processing, no genetically modified sugar cane varieties appear to be currently authorised under the EU GMO framework for food and feed uses.

In their letter, Eat Europe and Farm Europe warn that the inability to reliably distinguish between GM and non-GM sugar imports raises significant concerns regarding regulatory compliance, traceability, consumer transparency, food safety, and environmental protection.

The organisations are calling on the European Commission to clarify which measures are currently in place — or are envisaged — to ensure that sugar imported into the EU complies with existing GMO legislation and that adequate traceability and control are guaranteed throughout the supply chain. Eat Europe and Farm Europe emphasise that, in the context of bilateral relations with Brazil and the implementation phase of the EU–Mercosur Agreement, efforts should be made to ensure effective segregation between GM and non-GM sugar production streams in order to prevent non-compliant products from entering the European market.

The letter also requests further information on the implementation of the monitoring mechanisms established under Regulation (EU) 2026/687 concerning safeguard clauses within the EU–Mercosur framework. In particular, Eat Europe and Farm Europe seek clarification regarding the tools and data sources the Commission intends to rely on to monitor import volumes, price developments, and market dynamics for sensitive agricultural sectors such as sugar, meat products, and rice.

The organisations underline that effective and timely monitoring of trade flows is essential not only for the possible activation of safeguard measures, but also for ensuring compliance with EU regulatory requirements related to genetically modified organisms and traceability.

Eat Europe and Farm Europe also stress the importance of transparency for market operators and stakeholders, calling for accessible monitoring instruments such as dedicated dashboards or reporting mechanisms allowing up-to-date tracking of relevant market developments.

The COMAGRI calls for guaranteed funding for agriculture within the European Competitiveness Fund

Farm Europe warmly welcome today’s adoption by the European Parliament’s Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (COMAGRI) of the draft opinion by MEP Carlo Fidanza on the European Competitiveness Fund (ECF).

The ECF constitutes essential additional funding opportunities outside the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) to contribute to the transition to more efficient food systems. It is therefore essential to explicitly mention agriculture, food security, and agri-food value chains within the ECF. The earmarking must be binding, transparent, predictable and clearly opened to farmers. 

The draft opinion identifies the Competitiveness Fund as a key instrument to finance large-scale projects of European interest that exceed the capacity of individual Member States. These investments are considered essential to reinforce the resilience of the EU’s agri-food system, particularly in light of increasing climate, economic, and geopolitical pressures.

Against a backdrop of growing geopolitical instability, the Committee underlines that control over food resources is a key component of economic resilience and contributes to the EU’s broader security and defence capacity. An allocated budget in the ECF for strategic storage capacity for agricultural products and key inputs is therefore essential.

Farm Europe underlines the necessity, as stated in the opinion, of a dedicated ECF support to innovation and water in the agricultural sector, notably water resilience investments (irrigation efficiency, water storage, sustainable management of water resources for agriculture) and digitalisation (precision agriculture, digital services, decision-support tools, and data infrastructures). Such investments are deemed critical to maintaining agricultural production and preserving Europe’s agri-food excellence.

We now urge the European Parliament to confirm this positive signal in plenary. A strong endorsement will provide clear and positive perspectives for the entire agri-food sector.