« Time to declare an economic, social and environmental emergency for EU agriculture »

PRESS RELEASE
THE 4TH EDITION OF THE GLOBAL FOOD FORUM ABOUT TO KICK OFF

« Time to declare an economic, social and environmental emergency for EU agriculture »

Brussels, 2 December 2019 – The fourth edition of the Global Food Forum (GFF2019), organised by Farm Europe takes place on this 2nd & 3rd December at the heart of the European Union in the European Parliament in Brussels. Dacian Ciolos, President of Renew Europe and former Prime Minister and Commissioner for Agriculture, will open the event with Paolo De Castro, MEP and former Minister of Agriculture of Italy and Christiane Lambert, President of FNSEA.

The Global Food Forum has represented in the last years the opportunity to initiate and stimulate a proactive dialogue between European and national decision makers, representatives of our society, agricultural organizations, industry experts and researchers. The main purpose of this initiative has been and still is to be able to channel this renewed ambition for European agri-food systems into coherent and effective policies and to actively contribute to the creation of a new ambition for EU food systems.

By managing around 70% of the European surface and providing quality food to over 500 million citizens, the CAP is the main economic lever for achieving sustainability for agricultural models and all rural areas of the EU. Furthermore, the CAP and European farmers will be essential if the aim is truly to make the European New Green Deal and the “Farm to Fork” sustainable food strategy, announced by the new President of the European Commission, a success.

It is precisely in this context that Farm Europe is organizing the fourth edition of the Global Food Forum focusing attention on the theme: “EU agri-food sectors as front runners of EU future”.

Our rural areas and our agriculture are facing an emergency situation that requires a triple mobilization without delay. Today, it is necessary to declare a triple emergency for the European Union, for its agriculture and its rural areas: a social, an environmental and an economic emergency.

Within these two days and during two plenary sessions and 7 workshops – covering innovation, food chain, energy, resilience, carbon neutrality, nutrition and sectorial challenges – the event will focus on the best levers to promote the economic and environmental performance of EU agri-food systems while designing the best policy tools to achieve a common ambition at EU level, in particular via the future Common Agricultural Policy and the Green New Deal’s proposed Farm to Fork Strategy. The GFF2019 is gathering more than 300 participants from all across Europe.

The wrap-up closing session will discuss synergies between the CAP and EU sustainable food strategy with the involvement of Agriculture and Rural Development Committee Chair Norbert Lins, Christophe Hansen, Paolo De Castro and Ettore Prandini, President of Coldiretti.

————————————————— —

The 2019 Global Food Forum is notably under the patronage and chair of MEPs Dacian Ciolos, Paolo De Castro, Anne Sander, Peter Jahr, Simona Bonafè, Marie-Pierre Vedrenne, Jérémy Decerle, Martin Hlavacek and Irène Tolleret.

More details on the event and press contact : https://www.farm-europe.eu/evenement/global-food- forum-2019/ or at info@farm-europe.eu Twitter: @FarmEurope #GlobalFoodForum2019

Negotiations for the EU budget: the agreement will wait until 2020

Whether only three of them meeting in an informal way or all gathered in the Council of the EU, the majority of the agriculture ministers of the Member States continue to plead for the maintenance of the budget of the CAP in the future Multiannual Financial Framework. On the side of the European Parliament, the new legislature confirmed the position of the previous one for a strong contribution of the Member States to the Community budget. The Commission has noted the impossibility of an agreement on the MFF by the end of the year.

 

October: highlights in chronology

07/10 Meeting of the German, Polish and French Ministers

08/10 Warning cry for cohesion policy and EAFRD

09/10 Commission calls to decide on the EU budget

10/10 The new legislature of the European Parliament confirms the position of the outgoing parliament

14/10 The joint declaration presented to the Agriculture and Fisheries Council

18/10 Precise Negotiating Framework Required for December Summit

28/10 Concerns of member states’ parliaments at the Helsinki meeting

30/10 No agreement on the future MFF in 2019

 

full note available on FE Members area 

Agri-fish Council: Focus on the discussion on post 2020 CAP reform package& Regulations for Cap transitional rules

In a nutshell:

-CAP Reform Package 

—>  The Presidency recalled that delegations to the Council in July were mostly in favor of an increased environmental and climate ambition, accompanied by sufficient funding, a reduced administrative burden for all and a sufficiently flexible agricultural policy to take into account the specificities of MS.

The Presidency therefore proposes to continue to build the green architecture of the new CAP with a view to an increased environmental and climate ambition, a common percentage or fixed amount per MS. Funding for ecological programs could be strengthened by specific amounts or percentages for MS to organize by allocating interventions among pillars.

The presidency also stressed the contribution to the climate and the environment of the CAP, as well as the commonality of this policy.

—> The majority of MS expressed their support for the principle of a single common share for environmental and climate measures on both pillars proposed by the Council Presidency. However, they added that there were still a lot of technical details to be clarified, and especially that it would be arbitrary and premature to fix now a specific part and amounts. This is mainly due to the state of play of the negotiations on the CAP budget in the next MFF, but also the work remaining to be done on the list of measures to be included in this device proposed by the Presidency.

On this second aspect, the MSs overwhelmingly proposed measures to be added to the proposed list, such as basic income support, or all or part of the aid for areas subject to natural constraints.

While the treatment of small farms as part of the cross-compliance controls and the mandatory or non-mandatory nature of the eco schemes continue to divide the delegations, most of them have expressed their support for the increased level of climate and environmental ambition within the CAP. To this wish, many delegations also associated that of financial resources with this objective, by maintaining the budget of the CAP at the level of that of the EU at 27 and at current prices.

—> Latvia presented a joint statement with Poland, Estonia and Lithuania to include liming of acid soils in the list of measures.

-Regulations on CAP transitional rules

—>  – The Finnish Presidency aims to have the first proposal on flexibility be adopted by the fast-track producer. So far indications have shown that this adoption without amendment should be possible – EP shares this point of view

– The second one – a more substantial – lays down transitional provisions for the year 2021 and it amends all 4 basic acts plus the Regulation on agriculture in the outermost regions. This one needs more discussion in Council and EP, co-legislators aim adoption for mid-2020

—>  While several delegations favored an extension of the transition period, considering that one year would be too short, other delegations called for not postponing the implementation of the new CAP beyond 2022. Several delegations also supported the joint statement submitted by Bulgaria.

—>  Bulgaria presented a joint statement with CY, CZ, PO, RO to include the possibility to apply the transitional national support under Art 37 Regulation 1307/2013 at financial levels not lower than those of 2020

—> In concludings remarks, Commissioner Hogan said that: “we could remove many of the concerns if we can get agreement on MFF and CAP reform in 2020. Transitional national aids regulation was introduced may years ago before the last reform with a phasing out schedule at the end of 2020 therefore it is consistent with the agreement made in 2013 hence not in the COM proposal. In relation to 3,9% POSEI reduction, there is no problem from EC’s point of view if this money is reinstalled. On the possibility to use the rural programs of 2014-2020 in the context of these transitional regulations and those the n+3 continue to apply, the commissioner replied that the n+3 rule continues to apply, MS extending the rural development programs will be able to continue to implement them up to the 31st of December 2024. Technical level will be able to continue the work, but would strongly advise that both of the transitional regulations are speedily implemented otherwise MS will run the risk of some financial programs and risks in rural development programs in 2021”.

—> Indicative dates : next next planned Agri-Fish Council on December, 16&17, Brussels 
full version of the Council report available on FE members area

DO NECPs FROM THE 28 MEMBER STATES MEET EU TRANSPORT DECARBONISATION TARGETS?

According to the Governance of the energy union and climate action rules, Member States are required to establish a 10-year Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP) for the period from 2021 to 2030 in order to meet the EU’s new energy and climate targets for 2030. These Plans shall cover the five dimensions of the energy union on a common template so that the European Commission can be able monitor EU wide progress (as a whole) towards achieving these targets.

The draft NECPs of the Member States were already assessed and analysed by the Commission and the Member States have until the end of 2019 to submit their final, modified NECPs accordingly.

This study aims to contribute to this discussion on the state of the draft NECPs from the perspective of the transport sector. It examines all the 28 draft NECPs from this point of view, underlining the importance of the need to make vital efforts in this area for Europe to succeed and reach its energy and climate targets. It focuses on the question whether or not the proposed measures, ambitions and tools in these draft Plans are truly able to effectively contribute to the decarbonisation of the European transport sector.

Results of these study will be discuss in the Euractiv event on November, 27th 

Negotiations on CAP reform: none of the dossiers could be considered “closed”

 October was marked as follows:

 

  • On the EU Council side, Ministers reiterated that none of the reform dossiers could be considered “closed” to date.
  • On Parliament’s side, the Conference of Presidents has given the green light for a presentation of the reports of the reform in plenary at a date to set …
  • The Commission has unveiled the provisions for the transitional period.

 

October: highlights in chronology

08/10 Commissioner-designate’s point of view

14/10 Agri-Fish Council: nothing can be considered “closed”

16/10 Green light for CAP’s reports

23/10 A proposal for the CAP raising questions

31/10 The legislative “package” for the transition unveiled

 

full note available on FE Members area 

 

 

Wine sector: US retaliation on the back

1) This month started with the WTO announcement on 2 October over the U.S-EU Airbus subsidies case. The U.S. has been given the right to request a total amount of $7.5 billion (annually) equal to 6.9 billion euro incountermeasures with respect to the European Union and some EU member states, with October 18 as the effective date of additional duties. It has to be highlighted, that the US retaliation list is heavier on additional tariffs for agriculture products than for aircraft – 25% as compared to 10%.

In this regard, Spanish, French and Italian Agriculture Ministers took the floor during this month’s Agri-Fish Council in Luxembourg (14-15 October), and voiced their concerns respectively on the damaging impact on olive oil and table olives (ES), cheeses (IT) and wine (FR), among the most affected agri-food products.

2) Key topics for the wine sector as internationalization, innovation, trade dynamics, finance, digital transformation & competitiveness were at the core of the Wine Business Forum, which was held during the Milan Wine Week (6-13 October 2019), and which gathered more than 100 winemakers, businesses and experts.

3) Winemakers in France are changing their practices in an effort to adapt to the current changing environment and climatic hazards. Labels like organic, biodynamic and the so-called “high environmental value”certifications (HVE) are gaining traction, among them, and among consumers as well.

4) In terms of wine market figures, latest forecast by DG AGRI (October 2019) show that this year the EU28 wine production will return to a normal level, after the exceptional 2018 harvest of 189 million hectoliters. Estimates indicate a total wine production for 2019/2020 at around 161 Mio hectoliters.

 

full note available on FE members area 

Potential impact of a proposal of CAP 1st pillar aids based on AWU across the EU

A department reporting to the French Prime minister tabled last week a report proposing to consider a switch from 1st pillar aids per ha to a payment per AWU (and eventually the remaining part of the 1st pillar budget per ha). 

It suggested a 8000 €/AWU which would not be doable in any case as it would request more than 66 billions euros to finance such a scheme (to be compared to the 44 b€ of 1st pillar budget!). 

In the EU, current 1st pillar budget is equivalent to 5336 €/AWU.

Here below is a first estimation of what would imply such a proposal in terms of 1st pillar repartition between Member states (in case of a 8000 €/AWU and of a 5336 €/AWU) as well as estimated impact on farms’ incomes. The « proposal »  has been simulated for French farms of respectively 60 ha (and 1 AWU), 100 ha and 200 ha (1AWU) and 200ha with 2AWU. 

Figures speak by themselves!

The idea of farmers receiving a kind of “social minimum income” with as a result a farming sector loosing its competitiveness and the UE most of the added value generated by its agri-food sectors seems quite strange.
Budgetfor8000or5336euros:AWU:year
Max:AWUtorespect1stpillar
Frenchestimatedimpact

Will Eating Good Quality Healthy Food Become a Privilege in Europe ?

“Consumers today want it all: healthy, tasty, convenient, sustainable and affordable food. Sustainability and traceability are key requirements but very few shoppers are ready to pay a premium for these new benefits. People switch brands and products for sustainability and traceability reasons but these additional features comes with additional costs and do not bring any value.

This requires a value chain and business model overhaul. Otherwise, eating good quality healthy sustainable and traceable food will become a privilege of the happy few. Low income populations already massively suffer from diabetes and obesity in Europe…

There is an urgent need for all European food system actors, from regulators to farmers, including retail and food manufacturers, to work together.

They need to reconsider the way we farm, trade, eat and dispose of food with the help of innovative and consumer-centric solutions.”

 

This topic will be part of working sessions in the Global Food Forum 2019, EP, Brussels 2&3 December #EUGlobalFoodForum

To read the entire post: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/eating-good-quality-healthy-food-become-privilege-europe-sangouard/

Agri-Fish Council – Focus on the Discussion on Post 2020 CAP reform package

In a nutshell:

—> The Finnish Presidency‘s intention is to pursue the technical discussion & the two forthcoming ‘Agriculture and Fisheries Council’ meetings in November and December to discuss the higher environmental ambition of the CAP and the New Delivery Model. Furthermore, the Presidency intends to present updated drafting suggestions on all three Regulations by early December;
 
> On the NDM: the Presidency intends to continue the discussion both at the SCA and the Council levels and will present drafting suggestions on how to make the NDM practical and easier to implement in the Member States;  Indeed, the New Delivery Model and the “green architecture” were the main elements highlighted as “more discussion is needed on that”Additional flexibility and simplification “to better adapt the requirements for a higher environmental and climate ambition to member states’ needs were raised many times during the exchangeStill diverging positions on the following points: small farmers, eco-schemes, and minimum expenditure for the fruit and vegetables schemes;
 
> On the Horizontal Reg: broadly stable (Presidency’s comment in the Report), however still persistent discussion among MS about the scrutiny of transactions & the level of controls; 
 
> On the Amending Reg: the Presidency intends to further discuss technical details of wine labeling at the Working Party on Agricultural Products on 25 October;
 
—> Overall, Ministers highlighted their support towards a higher environmental ambition for the new CAP, but they also reiterated once again the importance of an appropriate CAP budget. Many delegations stressed that “no agreement on the CAP reform could be reached before an agreement on the next MFF”. While concerning specifically 2020 EU budget related to Brexit contingency measures, the Council will request the EP’s consent on additional measures aimed at mitigating the impact of a no-deal scenario for funding in a wide range of areas such as research and agriculture (the EU would continue to make payments to UK beneficiaries for contracts signed and decisions made before the withdrawal date or between the withdrawal date and the end of 2019, AS LONG AS the UK continues  to pay into the EU budget for 2020 and also accepts the controls and audits);
 
—> The Commission’s Communication on World’s Forests was praised overall but some Member States wished to push for further actions for example on the demand side including regulatory and non-regulatory measures. The ideas of building alliances and cooperation with 3rd countries and private sector players as well as the need to further strengthen the current framework and develop systems to attain deforestation free supply chains through certifications and due diligence circulated the discussion in order to rapidly reverse the trend of forest loss. The harmful effects of imported agricultural commodities was frequently cited as a root cause and that the EU needs to translate its policy commitments into its (future) trade agreements;
 
—>  On the Market situation: Hogan presented an overall general stability of the EU market situation with the exception of the following sectors: olive oil (high level of stocks, high level of harvest & low prices), beef (under constant pressure performing below 2018 levels) and sugar. However, main potential impacts stemming from the upcoming introduction of US additional tariffs following the WTO decision (Airbus case) and Brexit should be closely monitored, he said. Ministers welcomed the positive outlook, but expressed concerns with regards to the persistent difficult situation for the sugar (small signs of recovery), olive oil (very low price levels), beef and rice sectors. Biggest causes for uncertainties are no-deal Brexit (Ireland asked for an exceptional aid regulation in case of a hard Brexit as an additional instrument) & U.S. countermeasures. The need of cumulative impact assessments for trade negotiations (additional imports) was also being raised, together with the necessity to ensure a level-playing field, reactive tools to cope with market disruptions & a better coordination between trade and agri policy;
 
*LATEST SHORT-TERM MARKET OUTLOOK AVAILABLE HERE*
 
—>  New market observatories for Wine & Fruit and Veg will soon be available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/farming/facts-and-figures/markets/overviews/market-observatories;
—> Regarding the US additional duties on certain EU agro-food products (Airbus-Boeing WTO dispute) that would be imposed as of 18 October 2019, the Spanish, French and Italian Ministers took the floor and shared their concerns particularly on olive oil and table olives (ES), cheeses (IT) and wine (FR). The Italian delegation asked the Commission for the possibility to activate private storage for cheeses under the CMO regulation, while the French delegation highlighted the need to push for  more promotion activities and finally Spain pinpointed the need for the EU to promote the development of a rules-based international trade system, in view of a better protection for EU farmers; The Commission is wiling to negotiate a solution to avoid main disruptions. Measures as additional promotion activities were mentioned;
 
—> Indicative Planning / Dates: next planned Agri-Fish Council(s) on November 18 (eco-schemes, conditionality and related control and sanctions, the scope of the 30% ring-fencing under EAFRD, & the treatment of small farmers under conditionality, will be on the agenda + environmental and climate related aspects) and December 16.
full version of the Council report available on FE members area

NEW BREEDING TECHNIQUES: JUMPING GENES & GENE DRIVE UNDER THE LIGHT

This month some interesting news that worth more than a look come from both EU & U.S. recent research results and polls.

Researchers from Cambridge University highlighted the capacity of transposons, better known as “jumping genes” to rapidly generate new traits in various crops to make harvesting more efficient and maximize yield at the same time. New gene targeting technologies are found to be key for further optimization.

Finally, in the current EU executive’s institutional transition period which will see the next Commission to be appointed by year end, a closer look should be taken at how policy and regulatory developments for biotechnology will be addressed and ultimately shaped, going beyond the legislative process. Biotechnology, and specifically new genomic techniques, will be certainly part of the EC’s dedicated Directorate’s overall strategy (Health).  Member states will play a key role in this regard.

 

full note available on FE members area